March 19, 2002
	<<Previous Next>>

The Report A Weekly Internet Publication - March 19, 2002 - The Constitutional Revival Movement's News Source

UPDATES: - Radio Interview - Constitutional Quiz Question of the Week NEWS: - Is Time Short for Off-shore Games? - More on the NWO Global Tax INFORMATION: - e-file? or e-gad! - DCN - Digital Chains Now	Why The Tax Freedom 101 Report? "An immense effect may be produced by small powers wisely and steadily directed." - Noah Webster, Founding Father of American Education Support this work! If you appreciate this newsletter why not donate a Federal Reserve Note* to keep it alive. * FRNs are commonly and erroneously referred to as dollars. Past issues of the Tax Freedom 101 Report are archived here. Dear Netizen: Do you find the The Tax Freedom 101 Report interesting, useful, educational, or surprising? You do? Great! Then why don't you recommend this newsletter to a friend or two. They don't have to be a crazed liberty-lovin "radical" like you and me - even raging communists and everyone in between enjoys reading this newsletter! So spread the word... the forward button is just a click away... Subscription and advertising information for The Tax Freedom 101 Report is contained at the end of this on-line report.
UPDATES: - Radio Interview Tomorrow night on The Agitator Hour, Bryan Rusch, manager of the Tax Freedom 101 program will be interviewed. Topics will range from issues regarding the voluntary nature of participation in Social Security for citizens, the mandatory requirement for the payment of income taxes for withholding agents in receipt of foreign earned income, and the future in general of the Constitutional Revival Movement. To hear the show point your browser to The Other Radio Network, Wednesday evening March 20th, at 9:00 pm eastern standard time to listen. Call-ins for questions of the guest on the show are welcome. - Constitutional Quiz Question of the Week "In questions of power, then let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." - Thomas Jefferson This week's question: What is the meaning of the words "useful arts" in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8.? Last week's question: What is a "Bill of Attainder" as found in Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 and Article III, Section 3, Clause 2? Last week's Constitutional Quiz Question of the Week with answer can be found here. Run Your Personal and Business Affairs in Private! ~ Offering check cashing, bill paying, and wire services ~ ~ Private mail receiving and shipping services ~ ~ NO SSN's Required! ~ For a FREE electronic information package email: mpc@officeservices.coxatwork.com?SUBJECT=Send_Free_Info_Pak NEWS: - Is Time Short for Off-shore Games? How will the Treasury recapture citizen capital that has fled or is fleeing the shores of the U.S. for safer, more friendly customer oriented shores? By turning the screws upon Beasta (Visa) and SlaveCard (MasterCard) for the information required to track down the account holders that the Treasury perceives to be evading taxes due. Right now it is just a large fishing expedition, yet expect the dragnet to come in with some big fish. The smart people who understand privacy more than likely set up their offshore plans anonymously, in which case they probably needn't worry - for now. IRS gets credit card data American Express to provide names of those who pay through off-shore banks. Full story here. - More on the NWO Global Tax The key phrase used for the UN Tax by world socialists will be... "Financing the right to sustainable and equitable development." Or in short.. "Taking from the haves, and redistributing to the have-nots." The haves (the superpowers of the world) who've plundered the wealth and labor of other nations through expansion and then contraction of fiat currencies are now ready to expand their agenda on a global scale and put the final lock in place - that being world domination through socioeconomic and political control. The game plan has been and will continue to be... dole-out (payoff) nations that are willing to implement their socialist controls, and political agendas in return for their continued existence by being able to conduct commerce in their new world economic order. Will we all be rolled into one happy world of socialist stealing nations, and whining whimperers repeating the mantra... "pay your fair share!"? You bet. Global taxation for Americans - Details here. UN Conference To Promote Global Taxes; Bush Will Attend - Details here. Related article of things to come: What Really Killed Argentina? - Read the related article here. Do legal research like a judge (or his clerk): After you master the information in this video you’ll be able to: 1) Find the answer to any legal question in minutes; 2) Effectively find and fill out legal forms of all types. To see sample clips of the video, order one, or view it online go to: http://www.genevagroupdiscounters.com/legalbear/video.htm INFORMATION: The following article was written in tax year 2000 for the benefit of current Taxpayers contemplating forking over their hard earned money once again in 2001. No doubt you've heard the barrage of IRS public relations ads touting the ease of filing electronically over radio and television lately. Just why is the IRS pushing so hard for people to file electronically, make payment via electronic funds withdrawal, or even pay by credit card? Perhaps to tighten the electronic chains upon their taxpaying subjects, or 'customers' as the IRS refers to them. - e-file? or e-gad! - DCN - Digital Chains Now! by Bryan Rusch - Independent Representative for the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship If you're new to studying what the tax law really says, your requirements to pay income taxes, and are currently contemplating returning to non-taxpayer status - "Citizen" for short, but may in the interim decide to file electronically next year, you may want to think again! How do you "sign" your first on-line 1040 return? It is pretty difficult to write on glass. That is why you must first declare that you are indeed a Taxpayer under pains and penalty of perjury on IRS form 8453-OL and file that with the IRS the old fashioned way - via snail mail. You need only do that once by the way. The form 8453-OL is titled: U.S. Individual Income Tax Declaration for an e-file On-Line Return. Under the Instructions on the form this year (2000 A.D.) - "Who Must File," it states: If you are filing a 1999 Form 1040, 1040A, or 1040EZ through an on-line service provider and/or transmitter, you must file a signed 1999 Form 8453-OL with the IRS. If you do not, you will not have filed a valid return for 1999, and may not allow you to file electronically next year. The standard information required on this form to establish an e-file account with the Department of the Treasury's IRS includes your name, address, the SSN - of course, tax due or tax owed, and your John Hancock. After you have completed and SIGNED the 8453-OL form and returned it to the appropriate IRS "service" center it will authorize the IRS and the Department of the Treasury to do three things. 1.) Assign the Taxpayer a digital id "code", or Declaration Control Number (DCN for short) for e-filing purposes, present and FUTURE. 2.) Accept the Taxpayers first and FUTURE UNSIGNED 1040 worksheets electronically. 3.) Authorize the US Treasury or its designated "Financial Agents" (read Federal Reserve Banks) access for direct withdrawal from your financial institution (read Bank, Credit Card Company or other) or allow the Taxpayer direct deposit… (the Taxpayers choice - for now). It stands to reason that if you accept and then utilize the Treasury's DCN for an e-file, you have also automatically given the IRS the key to your "electronic chains" by your consent and DECLARATION that you are a Taxpayer liable for a tax and eligible for e-file via your signature on form 8453-OL for all returns, present and FUTURE. I would not put it past the IRS to decide in the future to use the DCN's assigned to Taxpayers by the Treasury to execute returns as the transmitter if the IRS determines that the Taxpayer or former Taxpayer for that matter, e-forgets or does not pay his "e-fair share." How e-conve-e-e-e-enient. Well why not? It stands to reason that the Taxpayer has already signed the e-return for the e-transmitter under the form 8453-OL for ALL returns, and since all that is required is the DCN, which the IRS can retrieve e-easily enough, it should make it a snap to forge a return and estimate the amount owed since nearly all records of financial transactions is readily accessible over telephone wires. Heck it will be so convenient that it would not surprise me if this is the ultimate goal by Congress and the IRS ten years from now. Your question at this point might be: Is there anywhere in the law that allows the IRS to file a return on behalf of a Taxpayer? Well yes and no. The traditional route for a Taxpayer filing a return has always required a signature under the pains and penalties of perjury, with the citizen in most instances unknowingly waiving their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. Today many Citizens are awakening to the fact that they had no actual filing requirement with respect to income taxes for their domestic source income. Many then decide to assert their rights, as citizens, and stop doing business with the IRS by refusing to file. When this happens the IRS tends to have a small problem. Without those signed returns from Citizens swearing that they are liable, the IRS is hard pressed to prove that the Citizen in question was actually required to file or owes a tax since a return was not properly executed. Now what? For the IRS to attempt to "get-the-money" if they do "believe" a tax is indeed owed, the Secretary of Internal Revenue must authorize an UNSIGNED dummy-return or substitute for return to be filed on behalf of the alleged Taxpayer. The IRS does this to justify issuing the soon to follow notice of deficiency by accessing a tax that may not actually apply. The actual liability issue for the situation where the "person" has only domestic source income (the case for most Citizens) needs to be ignored by the IRS to implement procedures and issue their deficiency. There is no lawful authority for the IRS to file these types of return on behalf of a "person" by the Secretary or his delegates when only domestic source income of Citizens is involved. The IRS can file a return for the Taxpayer when the Secretary determines that the activity of the person/Taxpayer involves indirect excise taxes. An example would be payment for the stamp taxes on bottles of liquor or tobacco products by the manufacturer. In this case the IRS does have authority to file a return on behalf of the delinquent Taxpayer. However we hear often enough, that the finger pointing and the "show-me-the-money" attitude exemplified by the IRS is due to the constant pressure by Congress to extract as much money as possible from the pockets of Citizens to pay for their Social agenda, and that the law is but a mere formality. Congress indiscriminately shouts: We want compliance! So what can one do? If the alleged Taxpayer challenges the return(s) in question filed by the IRS on their behalf, use of the discovery process via the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act allows for some very interesting letter writing when challenging the IRS and their actions. It is soon shown by the IRS' own documentation and actions that the returns are never perfected by the law. These returns by the Secretary never contain the valid signature of the presumed "Taxpayer", nor are the taxes being assessed apply. The assessment process begins to fall apart, and the notice of deficiency soon dries up only when properly documented. Be warned that this still won't stop the IRS from attempting to steal property. If you do not understand why please read the article: "A Tale of Two Cites" Things are now going to e-change! The IRS's opinion is: Once a Taxpayer - always a Taxpayer, and they want to keep it that way! The IRS has always required the citizen to state that they are a Taxpayer each and every year and DECLARE so via that jurat signature. Now with the advent of e-convenient e-file, it makes it that much e-easier for the Secretary to file returns for those delinquent e-Taxpayers. Heck, now it is really e-convenient. The Form 8453-OL for a DCN is a Declaration by the Citizen that he or she is indeed a Taxpayer. The burden of proof will be presumed to have moved from the IRS back to the Taxpayer. The bottom line is that the ignorant Citizen has again unwittingly created yet another, even more difficult, IRS form to overcome and challenge if and when e-returns are e-filed on their e-behalf. Egad! Consider these definitions of "Declaration" in Webster's: 1.) The ACT of declaring. 2.) That which is declared. 3.) In LAW, a formal presentation of facts by the plaintiff. 4.) A statement of goods that can be taxed. Put simply, when a return is e-filed for a Citizen the IRS can rely upon the form 8453-OL as the statement or declaration that the Citizen is in actuality - a Taxpayer. The IRS giddily refers to e-file as: Quick - Zip - Fast Round Trip. Fast round trip for who? Defendants in court actions? Consider this: If a Taxpayer now tries to challenge the IRS as to the validity of an assessment or deficiency against an e-return which they have no e-knowledge of, or was e-filed on their behalf, where can they e-go for e-relief or to petition the e-alleged tax? Tax Court? Tax Court is not a "court" - rather it is an administrative branch of the IRS for the benefit of Taxpayers, and I would believe e-Taxpayers as well. Do you think the IRS and their "judges" will uphold your defense that you are not a Taxpayer? Hardly. Good luck asserting your rights as a Citizen for that matter in a "court-of-law" found under Article III of the Constitution. If a Citizen has not properly reversed their e-actions that they are indeed not an e-Taxpayer, then what would their legal position be as a defendant if ever called to appear before the court(s)? Defendant / Citizen: "Your honor I am not a Taxpayer for the years in question." Plaintiff / IRS: "Your honor, he SWORE and DECLARED that he is in fact a Taxpayer right here on this form 8453-OL. Besides we have the e-returns to prove it, and that in fact he does owe us a tax." The Court's response: "Pay up." You just might want to e-think again before you file that form. Footnote to article: The basis of the article is that providing another form to the IRS results in just one more presumption of liability to overcome - like the filing of a 1040 if a person should wish to revert back to citizen from Taxpayer. If you have filed electronically in the past it does not preclude you from rectifying the situation and switching the presumption of liability back to the shoulders the IRS. This can be accomplished in the Affidavit of Revocation and Rescission process as provided by the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship. For more on this topic read: "I Formally Announce My Resignation from the Wealth Redistribution League". Wishing you a tax-free day, The Tax Freedom 101 Staff
http://www.taxfreedom101.com The Accelerated Adult Home-Study Program Home - Audio/Video Clips - The Questions -Plunder Protection - 10,000 Reward - Liberty Works Radio Products - Testimonials - Enrollment Info - FAQ's - Helpful Links Visitor's Center - Contact Us Subscription info for: "The Tax Freedom 101 Report" To subscribe: Simply fill in the email address you wish to receive the newsletter at in the "enter email address" below and then hit the purple "Join Now" button. A confirmation notice will be sent to you shortly afterwards asking you to confirm your subscription by reply email. Subscribe to The-Tax-Freedom-101-Report enter email address Powered by groups.yahoo.com or simply send an email to: The-Tax-Freedom-101-Report-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Advertise Your Product or Service in The Tax Freedom 101 Report Do you have a product or service available that our educated and faithful readership would be interested in knowing about? Many of our readers understand the intent of Article 1 Section 10 as written in the Constitution and are eager to do business and network with others who share they same understanding. To learn more about advertising in this weekly Internet publication click here.

"It's the action, not the fruit of the action, that's important. You have to do the right thing. It may not be in your power, it may not be in your time, that there'll be any fruit. But that doesn't mean you stop doing the right thing. You may never know what results come from your action. But if you do nothing, there will be no result." -- Gandhi

DISCLAIMER: The data on this website is the collaborative experience, contributions, and research of various websites, legal books, tax documents, researchers, associates, attorneys, CPA's, etc. and does not constitute legal advice. The primary purpose of this site is education. We do not advocate any specific course of action. What you do with this information and any course of action you decide to take, if any, is entirely your responsibility.

]