NoSSN - Defying the I.R.S., Anti-Tax Businesses Refuse to Withhold

Defying the I.R.S., Anti-Tax Businesses Refuse to Withhold
November 20, 2000

Reprinted from the NY Times. Without permission. If they complain, I'll take it down.

Defying the I.R.S., Anti-Tax Businesses Refuse to Withhold
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/19/business/19TAXX.html

November 19, 2000

By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

LAKE SHASTA, Calif. Al Thompson squeezed most of his manufacturing
company's 28 employees into a conference room here in October to
say he had good news: Income taxes must be paid by only a few
Americans, mostly those working for foreign-owned companies. So, he
told the workers, they would not have to pay income taxes ever
again. His business is exempt, too, he said.

No Social Security or Medicare taxes, either. The company was no
longer withholding taxes from their paychecks, he said, or telling
the Internal Revenue Service how much they made.

Mr. Thompson is part of a tiny but increasingly flamboyant fringe
of American business. Arguing that the federal tax laws do not
apply to them, these small companies are thumbing their noses at
the I.R.S. in a very public way: they have not only stopped
withholding taxes and turning them over to the government, they are
also bragging about it on Web sites and radio talk shows, and
organizing seminars to promote the gospel of defiance.

And they are boasting that they must be right because the I.R.S.
has not come after them, even though it knows what they are doing.
Mr. Thompson noted that he had not sent a weekly tax payment to the
I.R.S. since July, yet "I have not been drug off to jail."

Indeed, the I.R.S. has not only failed to pursue these businesses,
it has in some cases given refunds after they claimed they did not
owe taxes paid earlier. In at least two cases, the businesses say
they even received apologetic letters from the I.R.S. for not
rescinding penalties and issuing the refunds sooner.

Many tax experts express astonishment that the I.R.S. is aware
that legitimate businesses are cheating yet has not even written to
ask why their tax payments stopped, let alone begun action to make
them pay. This undermines the principle on which the American tax
system is based, they say: people who do not pay their taxes will
pay the consequences.

How many businesses are taunting the I.R.S. this way is impossible
to know. At least 23, including Mr. Thompson's, a Florida marketing
firm and a Texas plastics company, have made their decisions
public. Sixty business owners met on the weekend of Nov. 11 in
California to plan how to persuade thousands of others to join
them.

Over the years, a number of individuals have claimed to be out of
reach of the tax laws, but experts, including four former I.R.S.
commissioners, said this case was different. "This is tremendously
significant because we have never before had responsible parties
employers refuse to withhold," said Sheldon Cohen, a former
I.R.S. commissioner. "The system simply cannot work if they get
away with this."

The I.R.S. declined to comment on whether it was pursuing
enforcement actions against the 23 employers, citing a law that
protects taxpayer privacy. But there is no public record showing
litigation or enforcement actions like liens against the companies'
assets.

The failure of the I.R.S. to act even against those who openly
defy the tax laws raises questions about the agency's ability to
stop tax cheating. Asked whether the I.R.S. was moving against any
such tax resisters, the senior I.R.S. spokesman, Frank Keith, would
say only that "with limited resources the I.R.S. must often choose
which cases to pursue" and that it focuses on those that will
generate the most revenue.

But Jerome Kurtz, another former commissioner, disagreed. "That's
a nice pat line," he said, "but they don't go after only the people
with the highest income. They audit hundreds of thousands of
returns under $25,000 that produce little or no revenue and they
can take resources from those."

Michael Graetz, a tax policy adviser under President George Bush
and now a professor at Yale, added that he thought it was a big
mistake that the I.R.S. had not moved immediately against these
employers. "They have to act," he said, "or this will get out of
hand very, very quickly."

Commissioner Charles O. Rossotti of the I.R.S. has warned Congress
that the agency's enforcement resources have so shriveled that a
growing number of people will think they can get away with not
paying taxes, and the tax collection system will be threatened.

Some years ago, the I.R.S. did pursue organizations that publicly
declared they would not withhold taxes. One prominent case was a
church with a national following, the Indianapolis Baptist Temple.

Unlike churches that accept tax- deductible donations, the church
contended that it answered only to God and not to any government,
and therefore it was not required to withhold taxes from its
employees' paychecks. The I.R.S. demanded payment, and federal
judges ruled that the church owed $3.6 million in taxes for 1987
through 1993, plus interest. Federal marshals seized the parsonage
on Nov. 14 and are authorized to seize the church itself, which
members are now occupying in protest.

Since the federal income tax began in 1913 a steady, small current
of individuals have asserted that the 16th Amendment, which
authorized the income tax, was fraudulently adopted or that no law
makes anyone liable for taxes. Courts reject these assertions, and
a few prominent resisters have gone to jail.

But now the resistance is undergoing a big change. Not just
individuals are refusing to obey the tax laws; so are some business
owners, on whom the government relies to withhold taxes from
paychecks.

Irwin Schiff, owner of Freedom Books in Las Vegas and for three
decades a promoter of the idea that the tax laws are a hoax, said
he had noticed a shift five years ago when owners of small
businesses began soliciting his advice on how to drop out of the
tax system.

Mr. Schiff and others provided copies of refund checks from the
I.R.S. to small-business owners totaling $620,000. The refunds were
for taxes previously paid and were issued because a tax return was
filed reporting income as "zero" and stating that the previously
reported wages were really untaxable "remuneration." In two cases,
the resisters provided copies of what they said were letters of
apology from the I.R.S. and cited them as evidence that they are
right. (Experts say that the refunds and letters were probably
issued in error by processing clerks rushing through thousands of
returns.)

In recent years, Congress has reduced the resources available to
the I.R.S., even as the number of taxpayers and the complexity of
the tax laws have grown. Congress also imposed new rules under the
1998 I.R.S. Reform and Restructuring Act that make it much more
difficult for the agency to pursue tax cheats.

Under Commissioner Rossotti, enforcement actions have declined
sharply as the agency has focused on what he calls customer
service.

The views of Mr. Thompson, the small-business owner, on the
American tax system are representative of the tax resisters. His
company, Cencal Aviation Products, makes jackets, flight bags and
other accessories for private pilots.

During a two-hour meeting with employees in the company's
conference room in October with a reporter and photographer from
The New York Times permitted to attend, Mr. Thompson introduced his
tax adviser, a former I.R.S. criminal investigator named Joe R.
Banister. Income taxes, Mr. Banister explained, must be paid by
only a few Americans, primarily those at foreign- owned companies.

Several workers expressed delight. Now they could take home enough
money to pay their bills, some said. But two older women gently
asked what would happen if the boss was wrong. What if the Internal
Revenue Service came to seize her car and home, one asked.

"They would have no legal authority to do that," Mr. Thompson said
confidently.

Mr. Thompson and Mr. Banister, now a certified public accountant
in San Jose, Calif., detailed for employees what they call the 861
position. The Internal Revenue Code states that taxes apply to all
income, except for exclusions granted by Congress like the
tax-exempt interest from municipal bonds. One section refers to
"all income from whatever source derived."

Mr. Thompson and Mr. Banister say that Section 861, and the
regulations that carry it out, define "source" in such a way that
the tax laws do not apply to companies owned by Americans.

Mr. Banister told the employees that once taxes are withheld and
reported to the I.R.S. on a W-2 or 1099 form, the worker "will be
bullied" into wrongly paying taxes.

"But what happens," Mr. Banister asked, "if the person that owns
your company says: `Wait a second. I read the law, and I am not
required to give a W-2.' What's the I.R.S. going to do?"

While Mr. Banister preaches that most Americans need not pay
taxes, he has not followed his own advice. He said in an interview
that he had sent his taxes to the government.

Mr. Rossotti, who runs the I.R.S., said the 861 position was "just
plain nonsense." In 1995 a Tax Court judge rejected a claim based
on that position. Mr. Thompson said that he knew of that case but
that the ruling was from "a kangaroo court."

Mr. Thompson, like the other defiant business owners, has also
stopped paying state income taxes. But he continues to pay other
taxes, like property taxes, he said.

Mr. Rossotti warned that people who are taken in by claims that
they are exempt from taxes "put themselves at terrible risk, both
legally and financially," because the I.R.S. "will take enforcement
action to uphold the law."

Yet instead of enforcement, some companies are getting money back
from the government.

Bosset Partners Marketing in Clearwater, Fla., and N.T.D.
Electronics of Huntington Beach, Calif., say that the I.R.S.
refunded more than $200,000 of withholding taxes from prior years.

Dick Simkanin of Arrow Custom Plastics in Bedford, Tex., said he
was pursuing $2.9 million in refunds. Mr. Simkanin said he had
stopped withholding income, Social Security and Medicare taxes from
his 49 workers' paychecks last January. Since then he has announced
that he will not pay taxes or file tax returns for himself or his
company, and the I.R.S. has not even called.

"I am not a tax protester," Mr. Simkanin said. "I think we need to
pay all required taxes because obviously the different levels of
government need funding to operate, but when government oversteps
its bounds and goes over the law, that is kind of where you need to
put your foot down. I am willing to pay any tax so long as I am
liable."

Mr. Banister, the former I.R.S. agent, said that he had asked his
superiors to show him what law makes an individual or company
liable to pay taxes, but that they had refused. That convinced him,
he said, that government officials knew that the tax laws were "a
great deceit."

As word spreads over the Internet, on talk shows and at seminars
that the I.R.S. has not acted against the defiant employers, tax
resisters say other employers are dropping out of the tax system as
well.

"There are thousands of us," Mr. Thompson said.

The New York Times on the Web
http://www.nytimes.com

"Thank God we don't get all the government we pay for." -- Will Rogers

DISCLAIMER: The data on this website is the collaborative experience, contributions, and research of various websites, legal books, tax documents, researchers, associates, attorneys, CPA's, etc. and does not constitute legal advice. The primary purpose of this site is education. We do not advocate any specific course of action. What you do with this information and any course of action you decide to take, if any, is entirely your responsibility.

]