|
| August 6, 2002 | ||
|
The Report http://www.taxfreedom101.com A Weekly Internet Publication - August 6, 2002 - The Constitutional Revival Movement's News Source
|
UPDATES: - Home-Business Discount to SAPF Members - New FRNS States Available NEWS: - Politically Incorrect Motivated Audits Shown - Another World Economy Shudder Coming - Citizens Practicing Socialism: The Triumph of Big Government INFORMATION: - Democracy: The Antithesis of Liberty
| Why The Tax Freedom 101 Report? "An immense effect may be produced by small powers wisely and steadily directed." - Noah Webster, Founding Father of American Education Dear Netizen: Do you find the The Tax Freedom 101 Report interesting, useful, educational, or surprising? You do? Great! Then why not recommend this newsletter to a friend or two. They don't have to be a crazed liberty-lovin' "radical", heck even raging communists and everyone in between enjoys reading this newsletter! So spread the word, your email 'forward' button is just a click away! If you can't forward this newsletter can you support this work? If you appreciate this newsletter and find the information contained herein important consider donating a Federal Reserve Note* or two to keep the information coming. * FRNs are commonly and erroneously referred to as dollars.
| |||||||
UPDATES: - Home-Business Discount Available to SAPF Members If you're a Save-A-Patriot Fellowship member did you know that you can participate in The Tax Freedom 101 Home-Study Program with Home-Business Opportunity at a substantial discount? This offer was first made available back in July of 2000. The offer is still available, so if you are looking to offer your fellow citizens an educational product first without the need of applying for membership in the fellowship, then you should seriously consider looking into this program. Why? Because most people who pick-up the TF101 Home-Study program later go on to become fellowship members themselves. So as a fellowship member representative you will also pick up credit for someone who enrolls later in the fellowship as a member! Details on how to receive the substantial discount to be a marketer of The Tax Freedom 101 - Accelerated Adult Home-Study Program with home-business is contained in the 'Members Support' Center at Tax Freedom 101.com.
Joan Hartzell, FSM - District of Columbia If you are a member of the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship you can begin fellowshipping, rendezvousing, and networking with other fellowship members in your home state. For details and benefits of FRNS please login at the 'Members Support' Center at Tax Freedom 101.com Former Federal Internal Revenue Officer Tells All Personal revelations and discoveries regarding the truth behind the income tax made this successful revenue officer resign. Learn who, how, what, when, and why! Incredible credibility and professionalism provides a knock out video presentation. Learn more details here. NEWS: IRS reveals smoking gun Documents Nail IRS on Political Audits Former IRS Commissioner Has Choice Words for Rossotti's Minions For a plethora of other alleged politically motivated audits, and Judicial Watch's saga reference our News Story: The IRS - The American Politburo's Personal KGB, from the September 12th, 2000 edition of The Tax Freedom 101 Report by going here.
We made mention of the Argentina financial and political unrest back in the January 8th edition of The Tax Freedom 101 Report [One Reason Why the World Hates America]. The related article in that issue "What Really Killed Argentina" by Hugo Salinas Price nails the underlying reason[s] for the fiscal irresponsibility showing itself in these banana republics. Here are some selected excerpts from the Price article:
and... "This system of dollar reserves, is a massive system of world-tribute payable to the U.S. It is unjust and implies the impoverishment of the world for the benefit of the U.S. The impoverishment does not produce its results evenly. Some countries go belly-up before others. Argentina is the nation presently going under." by Anthony Faiola, The Washington Post - find the story at the International Herald Tribune here. Banking crisis grips Uruguay The National Taxpayers Union (NTU) is lobbying Congress to find a another way in which the government collects tax revenue. The question is whether the 'tax revenue' being collected is required to be paid by citizens in the first place. Would another mechanism of collection really change the situation and 'Triumph of Big Government'? Macy's executive Beardsley Ruml who is also mentioned in the referenced news story below is credited for pay-as-you-go tax withholding - taking the concept from deferred or installment payments from customers on credit. Ruml was also the Chairman of the New York branch of The Federal Reserve. Connecting any dots? Walt Disney's Donald Duck would later condition and sell the withholding plan wholesale to the entire country during WWII in the short: The Spirit of '43 Income Tax Withholding Called 'Triumph of Big Government' Take Home 100% of Your Next Paycheck! What does the law say about those who refuse to fill out, or decide to terminate the voluntary withholding agreement W4? Learn how to present the proper paperwork to $top tax withholding in the workplace! Detailed 104 page report and audio here. INFORMATION: THE LIBERTY TREE Vol. 4 Number 1 - January 2002 Democracy: The Antithesis of Liberty An editorial by Jim Kerr, Staff Paralegal - SAPF Paralegal Department In my line of work, frequently having occasion to go into the constitutions of different states, I have come to learn that not all constitutions are created equal. For instance, I have noted that the Massachusetts constitution refers to its citizens as "subjects." This surprised me, since Massachusetts, once the cradle of liberty in this country, effectively resisted the tyranny of King George III; once loose of his royal yoke, they were no longer his subjects, becoming sovereign citizens vested with the full rights given to us by the Creator; and King George was no longer our sovereign. Other than this, however, the Massachusetts constitution is a pretty good one. However, the lamest U.S. [possession] constitution I have seen, is that of Puerto Rico. The very first sentence of the preamble states, "We, the people of Puerto Rico, in order to organize ourselves politically on a fully democratic basis…." It also states, "The democratic system is fundamental to the life of the Puerto Rican community; * * * We understand that the democratic system of government is one in which the will of the people is the source of public power…." Then, in Article I Sec. 2, it states the exact opposite: "The government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico shall be republican in form…." Moreover, in Article VII Sec. 3, it states, "Section 3. No amendment to this Constitution shall alter the republican form of government established by it or abolish its bill of rights." [All emphases mine] This tells me that the men who penned this constitution were either very ignorant, or they had a severe case of cognitive dissonance ("doublethink"). While it is perhaps (arguably) excusable for ordinary citizens to be oblivious of the difference between a constitutional republic and a democracy (due to the dumbing-down of our citizens by our government schools and the conditioning of the controlled mass media), that politicians, who graduated from law school and are highly paid to know about such things, could write such an inferior and contradictory constitution, is truly mind-boggling. In this article, we will first define our terms; show two examples that demonstrate the vile nature of a democracy; and then demonstrate how the democratic process, in combination with the deluding influence of the mass media results in tyranny of the most insidious variety. What is a democracy? What is a democracy? Back in November 30, 1928, the War Department issued a 156 page book defining "democracy" thusly:
A Democracy is incompatible with a constitution because the principle there is that the sole standard of right or wrong is determined by a counting of noses; a majority rule. A good example of that system is the democratic city-states of Greece where the majority had the right to vote a death sentence for a man if they disapproved of his ideas, such as in the case of Socrates. Socrates was condemned to death because a majority of the citizens found that his ideas were subversive to Athens. While he declared his fellow citizens were wrong in their decision, being a true democrat, he believed they had the right to put him to death by popular vote. Conversely, a constitutional republic is predicated on the principle that citizens have rights which come from the Creator. People have the right to life, liberty, and to own property. These rights cannot be infringed upon by persons individually (as with a monarch, for example), or collectively (by popular vote). Moreover, the only legitimate function of a limited government is to protect the people's rights to life, liberty and property: nothing more, nothing less. Now let us define what rights are. Neither the government nor any group or organization has any rights. Rights are a concept that pertains only to individuals. The most fundamental right is the right of a man to his own life. All other rights are merely corollary to or derivative of this right. A right is a religious/moral concept within a social context. It pertains to what is morally correct for men to do in relation to other men. Once you have established that a man is the owner of his own life, that he has a right to live, that he can live his life as he pleases (so long as he does not violate the rights of other men), and does not belong to anyone else, you have the base from which all other rights are derived. If a man has a right to his own life, then he has a right to take all those actions which are necessary: necessary by his nature as a man, as a rational being, to sustain and protect his own life. Next let us distinguish a right from a privilege. A right is equally applicable to all individuals - to all human beings. A certain action is a right if it can be shown that it is required by a man's nature as he exists. If so, then it is equally applicable to all other men. Therefore, in determining what is or is not properly a right, it is then necessary to establish that said right apply equally to all men. If it does not, then it is not a right, but merely a privilege. For example, when people claim to have a right to collect government benefits such as welfare, they are claiming they have the right to free food, and housing at the expense of other men. This is not a right, because to provide unearned property for the one group requires the extraction of slave labor from another group; and legitimizing this plunder by legalizing it does not change the fact that the rights of some men are being violated under the guise of philanthropy-mandatory, false philanthropy. That is contrary to the concept of rights. Nothing which infringes some man's rights for the benefits of others, can morally or logically be a right. A right has to apply equally to all. Let us now examine how the controlled mass media exacerbates the evils of democracy in our age. I think most of our members will agree that the majority of voting Americans have the mindset of lemmings. They will also probably agree that the controlled media and Hollywood have been largely successful in molding the minds of these lemmings to think politically correct thoughts. Moreover, they have even succeeded in instilling fear of expressing politically incorrect thoughts. Imagine, if you have a school age child, that his teacher told him to write a report on democracy. What would his teacher have to say if he wrote a report expressing views consistent with this article? And what would you think the Principal would have to say if the teacher praised your child for that report? Remember, this is an age where kids can be kicked out of school for wearing t-shirts showing a man and a woman holding hands, and stating, "Straight Pride! " Indeed, questioning democracy is not a thing that a prudent person does lightly. Our politically correct dogma says that if we didn't have democracy, we wouldn't be free. In fact, the belief in the efficacy of democracy as the guarantor of wealth and liberty has become a religion, of sorts, in our hemisphere; and our politicians and preachers alike fear to question it. The influence of our controlled media has become overwhelming in the last century with the introduction of radio, motion pictures and television. Those who control the mass media can and do manipulate the beliefs, opinions and emotions of the public on every issue that is important to the globalist regime. As such, what may appear to be democracy -unlimited rule by popular vote - is nothing other than oligarchy. [Or, at least the appearance of such. There is nothing in the constitution that authorizes democracy, oligarchy, socialism or anything other than a limited republic. Any departure from this is the result of seditious individuals and cannot be legitimized by a "War Powers Act," the Illuminati, the Masons or anything else.] While the Liberty Tree is not a religious publication, it is frequently helpful to look in the Bible, a history book of great antiquity, for that is where the concept for liberty and how to attain it, was first set forth. Moreover, "Those who forget the lessons of the past are doomed to repeat them." (Santayana, The Life of Reason). The Bible, a collection of very political books, treats these issues quite exhaustively. I would say that democracy is a "delusion". And if you look up in a good concordance the definitions of the terms "whore", "harlot" and "drunk" in the context used in the context of Revelations 17:1-2, it would seem that even the Bible condemns democracy.
The trial of Socrates - The trial of Socrates took place in 399 BC when he was nearly 70. The charges were that he refused to recognize the official gods of the state, that he introduced new gods and that he corrupted the young. In 404, five years before the trial, a 27-year war between Athens and Sparta had ended in the defeat of Athens. The Athenian democracy was overthrown and replaced by a group of men, subsequently known as the Thirty Tyrants, installed by Sparta. In the course of earning their name, the Tyrants killed so many citizens that they lasted for only a year, though it was not until 401 that democracy was fully reinstituted. The power of the democrats was still tenuous in 399. The state alone determined what idols were acceptable; it had its own procedures for the official recognition of gods; and anyone who ignored them was in effect challenging the legitimacy of the democratic state. This is what Socrates was up against when he faced the 500 Athenian citizens who were to judge him. "Your mind has been made up for you by people you don't know, the thought machines control the scene so well, it doesn't show; how can I contain this anguish and this pain, knowing that your eyes are blinded by the lies; have your eyes been blinded by the lies…" - Excerpt from Carl Klang's song, Blinded By the Lies
Sources: Washington Times; and, Home School Legal Defense Association. Wishing you a tax-free day, The Tax Freedom 101 Staff | ||||||||
The Accelerated Adult Home-Study Program To subscribe: Simply fill in the email address you wish to receive the newsletter at in the "enter email address" below and then hit the purple "Join Now" button. A confirmation notice will be sent to you shortly afterwards asking you to confirm your subscription by reply email.
or simply send an email to: The-Tax-Freedom-101-Report-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Do you have a product or service available that our educated and faithful readership would be interested in knowing about? Many of our readers understand the intent of Article 1 Section 10 as written in the Constitution and are eager to do business and network with others who share they same understanding. To learn more about advertising in this weekly Internet publication click here. Dear Subscriber: If you have any comments, suggestions, news stories or ideas for The Tax Freedom 101 Report send your feedback to the editor. | ||||||||
|
| |||
| |||
| DISCLAIMER: The data on this website is the collaborative experience, contributions, and research of various websites, legal books, tax documents, researchers, associates, attorneys, CPA's, etc. and does not constitute legal advice. The primary purpose of this site is education. We do not advocate any specific course of action. What you do with this information and any course of action you decide to take, if any, is entirely your responsibility. | |||