NoSSN - TAX BASICS 101, WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW -- by Gordon Phillips

TAX BASICS 101, WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW -- by Gordon Phillips
January 16, 2002

<<Previous

Next>>

01-16-2002 A.L.E.R.T. (A.merica L.aw E.ducation R.ights & T.axation)

TAX BASICS 101, WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW -- by Gordon Phillips

Ours is, and always has been, a republican form of limited government

under a written law. The Constitution declares itself to be the supreme

Law of the land at Article VI, Clause 2.

The first three articles of the Constitution grant only those specific

powers enumerated therein to the three branches of government -- to the

legislative under Article I; to the executive under Article II, and; to

the judiciary under Article III. Anything not specifically stated in the

Constitution is not authorized, and is therefore unconstitutional.

Some of our national elected officials have claimed, seditiously I might

add, that anything not specifically forbidden in the Constitution is

therefore permitted by default. If true, this would be Reverse Supreme

Law, a ludicrous contention. It may be possible to play a country music

record backwards and get back your house, your pickup and your girl

friend, but written law doesn't work that way. If the Constitution does

not specifically say it's OK, it's not OK.

The first word in the entire Constitution under Article I, Clause 1 is the

word 'All', as in 'All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested

in a Congress of the United States.' It does not say 'Some' or 'Most'. It

does not say 'All, most of the time,' nor is it qualified in any other

way. All law making power is vested in the Congress. None is granted to

the President, nor to any judge.

Seen in light of the above, 'executive orders' go to officers of the

executive branch only and may be ignored by the citizen. Where it

otherwise, we would be under a monarchy. Of course, that won't stop the

Elian Gonzalez Welcome Wagon from smashing down your front door pursuant

to an executive order. But that's a function of the ignorance of those

doing the smashing.

Likewise, no utterance emanating from the mouth of a judge can be law.

Were it so, the Constitution would have been written by Lewis Carroll, not

James Madison and his peers, and the powers of the tyrannical Red Queen

('off with his head!') would have been conveyed on the judiciary ('off

with his rights!'). But I can't find that in the Constitution. College law

professors are invited to look.

Acts of Congress express legislative intent as 'the force of the law'.

However, no ordinary act of the legislature is superior to the

Constitution, and no citizen is under any duty or obligation to uphold a

clearly unconstitutional law. Under the Constitution, the sole power of

the Congress to legislate for the citizen residing within the 50 union

states is constrained to interstate commerce and postal roads only.

Please allow me to repeat that. Under the Constitution, the sole power of

the Congress to legislate for the citizen residing within the 50 union

states is constrained to interstate commerce and postal roads only. Repeat

this to yourself until full understanding sinks in.

Under Amendment V, the Constitution protects private property from being

taken without due process, or for public use without just compensation,

thereby slamming shut the door on the forced participation of the citizen

in collectivist federal welfare 'entitlement' programs such as Social

Security, free cheese, etc.

The lawful power of government extends only to the protection of life and

property. When government goes beyond these powers, it must discriminate

against certain classes of citizens in favor of other classes.

One is reminded of young hatchlings in the nest with their beaks pointed

skyward, each bleating for the next available worm. Now imagine groups of

taxpayers doing the same thing (A.A.R.P. comes to mind), each vying for

their 'fare share' of government mediated wealth redistribution, and you

understand democracy. Teach your children.

The Constitution allows the raising of taxes only when applied for the

general welfare of all citizens equally. The 14th Amendment guarantees the

equal protection of the laws (in fact, this is the only remaining effect

of the 14th since all Negroes and orientals granted citizenship status by

the 14th are long since deceased, or are otherwise listed in the Guinness

Book of World Records).

Therefore, participation in federal wealth redistribution schemes such as

Social Security can only be elective (voluntary, consensual) for the

citizen within the 50 states, since forced participation in any scheme

which spends federal funds taxed from one class of citizens (the

producers) for the benefit of another (the nonproducers, including career

welfare specialists) is clearly unconstitutional.

Since unalienable rights come from God Almighty and not from government or

from any other creation of mere mortal man, they cannot be taxed.

Nontaxable rights include the rights to 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of

Happiness.'

The Constitution provides for two distinct classes of taxation, and two

only: direct and indirect.

As evident from a reading of James Madison's daily notes taken during the

Federal Convention of 1787, the original intent of the Framers of the

Constitution was that indirect taxes in the nature of excises be laid upon

the importation of foreign goods, including investment capital, the

principle being that the foreigner would be taxed for the privilege of

doing business within our vast markets, while the citizen within the union

states would remain free of internal taxation on matters of common law

right such as the exchange of his labor for compensation (*).

(* Under the Internal Revenue Code, there is no excise imposed on the

domestic earnings of the citizen living and working within the union

states who makes an exchange of his labor with another for compensation,

since it is an equal exchange of value with neither party gaining from the

transaction, wherefore no taxable gain (profit) results.)

As envisioned by the Framers, the limited revenue derived from excises

laid on foreigners would fund the day-to-day operations of a small,

limited federal government, while the citizen would be taxed only when

engaged in allegedly privileged domestic occupations such as the

manufacture, sale and distribution of alcohol, tobacco and firearm

products.

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 authorizes Congress to lay and collect

indirect excise taxes which must be uniform throughout the states. When,

due to a TRUE FISCAL EMERGENCY -- such as the need to extinguish any debt

carrying over from the previous year, to raise funds to prosecute a war,

or to send billions to Israel (only kidding) -- said excises should prove

insufficient, the power of direct taxation could then be resorted to.

Once the shortfall has been arrived at, Article 1, Clause 2, Section 3

authorizes Congress to apportion the amount to the states as a direct tax

in proportion to their respective populations, to be determined by the

conducting of a census every ten years pursuant to Article 1, Section 9,

Clause 4. Each state would then raise its respective share of the

apportioned direct tax pursuant to the authority and limitations imposed

under its own state constitution.

Five direct taxes have been apportioned to the states within our nation's

entire history, the last in 1861 and none during the entire 1900's. The

reason for this is easy to understand by considering the following

example.

Let us suppose that Congress wanted to apportion a six trillion 'dollar'

(*) direct tax to the states in order to entirely extinguish the so-called

'federal debt'.

(* The Federal Reserve Note -- the green tax anticipation coupon in your

wallet bearing the likeness of various deceased notables -- is commonly,

but erroneously, referred to as a dollar. It is also not a legal note. It

is also not federal. And there are no reserves. Other than that,

everything is fine. Alan says so. Read 'Losing Your Illusions' for

specifics on this)

Since there are currently 435 representatives in the House of

Representatives, a state such as New Hampshire with two representatives

would receive a bill for 2/435th's of the apportioned amount, or

approximately twenty-seven and a half BILLION 'dollars'

(F$27,586,206,897.55 to be precise).

The population of New Hampshire numbered 1,236,000 according to the 2000

census. Assuming half of this number to be property owners (and this is

just a guess for illustrative purposes only), each and every owner would

receive a bill from the New Hampshire state legislature for approximately

F$44,638 -- more money than most Granite Staters earn in a year. Which

would immediately cause a revolt, especially in light of the fact that the

New Hampshire state constitution authorizes the right of rebellion and

states that taxes may be laid on property only with the 'consent' of the

owner. Wow. You should read it sometime.

Now you understand why Congress has not laid a direct tax in 141 years (as

of this writing in January of 2002); because direct taxes create too much

accountability in the minds of the people, and we can't have that. Far

easier to exact huge sums through the withholding of wage taxes, an

insidious weekly draining of human capital which a docile and tamed people

have come to accept as their dutiful 'fair share'. This is the 'out of

sight, out of mind' principle hard at work.

Certain past legislation laying direct taxes offered a discount to any

state which paid its apportioned share in a timely fashion, yet, should it

fail or refuse to do so, left the door open for federal troops to enter

the state and collect the tax from its citizens through force of arms.

This type of internal invasion probably wouldn't 'play well in Peoria' and

has never needed to be resorted to.

While many erroneously believe the 16th Amendment to have provided for a

new and hitherto unknown form of taxation which is neither direct nor

indirect but is somehow a bastardized combination of the two as is

currently taught in some Case Law Schools, the 16th in fact did not amend

the Constitution, because it did not repeal Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3

or Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 which impose the rules pertaining to

direct taxes, nor did it repeal Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 which

imposes the rule pertaining to indirect taxation.

The constitution cannot conflict with itself, and the aforementioned

supreme taxing clauses were still in full force and effect the very moment

the ink dried on the 16th Amendment. They are still in full force and

effect right this minute. Isn't this exciting? I think so.

As correctly read by the supreme Court in the 1916 cases 'Brushaber vs.

Pacific Railroad Co.' and 'Stanton vs. Baltic Mining', the 16th Amendment

simply prohibited Congress from removing the income tax from the great

class of indirect taxes to which it inherently belonged from the

beginning, and attempting to place the income tax into the category of

direct taxes which would then require apportionment to the States. Do you

see how simple this is to understand? But apparently not at Harvard Law.

Note that there is still to this day no authority in the Constitution for

Congress to directly tax the labor or other property of a citizen, the

16th Amendment notwithstanding, making the Internal Revenue Code 100%

constitutional as written. It is the misapplication of the tax code that

is unconstitutional, not the code itself.

The citizen becomes the subject of internal taxation only when engaged in

an activity not of unalienable right -- i.e., one which can be licensed

(regulated) by the federal government. All laws pertaining to property

being the sole jurisdiction of the states, occupational licenses such as

are applied for by a beautician, a real estate agent or a chiropractor,

are state-issued and are not a federal matter.

The exercise of a natural right can be neither regulated nor taxed.

However, the act of making application for an occupational license

converts a right -- in this case, the right to work for a living as a

beautician, a realtor or a chiropractor, and to keep 100% of the earnings

-- into a regulatable privilege which can then be taxed (and is).

This is why the act of applying for an occupational license can only be

voluntary. As in all matters, licenses are issued to applicants only.

Since there can be no requirement to apply, all applications are, and can

only by, 100% voluntary. However, by submitting the application, the

applicant agrees to come under the requirements of the law, at which point

all constitutional arguments become moot.

A long standing principle of American jurisprudence is that a law must be

written explicitly with all legal terms defined, to mean exactly what it

says and to say exactly what it means. A law must also be readily

understandable by any person of average intelligence, otherwise, as the

courts have correctly ruled, such a law would have to be held 'void for

vagueness'. This is remarkably easy to understand. But apparently not at

the Justice Department.

All United States law is categorized into 50 'titles' of law comprising

the entire United States Code, abbreviated 'USC'. Regulations to

administer and enforce the Law are promulgated by agencies of the

executive branch.

Title 26, abbreviated '26 USC', encompasses the entirety of the Internal

Revenue Code. The Department of the Treasury oversees the Internal Revenue

Service, with the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury delegated

down to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, who then further delegates

his authority down to agents and other employees of the IRS. Treasury

regulations for the Internal Revenue Code are found in 26 Code of Federal

Regulations.

It has been the consistent experience of those educated in these matters

that the vast majority of tax attorneys, C.P.A.'s and tax preparers have

never read, and for that reason, do not understand the actual, limited

liability of the citizen working exclusively within the 50 union states

for income and employment taxes. They rely instead upon IRS booklets,

pamphlets, publications, guidelines, circulars, 'case law', etc., none of

which are, or can be, the law itself.

In order for such publications to be law, the IRS would have to be

included under Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution where, as stated

earlier, all law making authority is vested in Congress. However, no

mention of the IRS can be found there. Please inform your C.P.A. of this.

The tax code was first codified in 1939, again in 1954, and again in 1986.

We are currently under the 2002 version of the 1986 code. In order to

understand the Internal Revenue Code which encompasses far more than just

income and Social Security employment tax -- also known as the wage tax --

one must first understand the compartmentalization and subdivision of the

code.

The code is currently divided into eleven subtitles, the first five of

which, subtitles A through E, each cover different categories of taxation.

Subtitle F covers procedure, administration and general definitions which

apply throughout the code when not replaced by local, specific definitions

applicable to certain sections or paragraphs only. The remaining five

subtitles, G through K, pertain to the Joint Committee On Taxation,

Financing Presidential Election Campaigns, etc.

Subtitle A embraces the income tax.

Subtitle B embraces estate and gift taxes.

Subtitle C embraces wage (employment) tax.

Subtitle D embraces miscellaneous excise taxes.

Subtitle E embraces alcohol, tobacco, and 'certain other excise taxes'.

Each subtitle is totally distinct and separate from the other subtitles

with regard to the tax to which it pertains, and the liability and

enforcement provisions within one subtitle do not apply to another. For

example, Subtitle A, income tax, as stated above, is a distinct and

separate class of tax from subtitle C which is the wage or Social Security

employment tax. Proof of this is that the estate tax under subtitle B lies

between them, and pertains to neither.

As with all law, jurisdiction must first pertain. With regard to taxation,

the following four questions pertaining to Who, Where, What and When must

always be asked and answered before a determination can be made as to the

liability of a particular individual for a particular class of taxation:

Question #1 -- Who is the person being taxed?

Question #2 -- Where is the person geographically located? The

Constitution is geographical in its application, applying solely within

the States of the Union. Congress's authority to legislate for the citizen

living within the union States, as stated earlier, is specifically limited

to interstate commerce and postal roads. However, Congress has plenary

power to legislate within the seat of government, currently the District

of Columbia, and within the federal territories and possessions, without

regard for the constitutional constraints which pertain within the union

states.

Question #3 -- What is the object of the intended taxation -- i.e., in

what activity was the person involved? Is it a taxable activity? Note that

the income tax is imposed under code section 1 on the 'taxable income' of

an unspecified 'individual', not on the individual himself.

Question #4 -- Within what period or time frame did the activity take

place?

The IRS routinely designates the citizen who has ever filed a tax return

as a 'taxpayer', a one-word term legally defined at code section

7701(a)(14) as 'any person subject to [liable for] any internal revenue

tax.' However, liability cannot arise from mere activity alone since

geographical and other requirements may not apply. Liability must arise

from written statute.

The income tax is imposed on taxable income under code section 1, chapter

1, in subtitle A. The only liability statute in all of subtitle A,

chapters 1-6, making any person liable for the tax on income is code

section 1461 which makes the 'withholding agent' as defined in code

section 7701(a)(16) '... required to deduct and withhold any tax under the

provisions of sections 1441, 1442 and 1443.'

An examination of these three sections reveals their applicability to

pertain exclusively to foreigners: section 1441 pertains to the

nonresident aliens, meaning to the foreigner residing outside the united

States; section 1442 pertains to foreign corporations; and section 1443

pertains to certain foreign tax-exempt organizations.

Noticeably missing is the authority to withhold income tax from the

citizen living and working with the 50 states! In fact, there is no code

section to be found anywhere within subtitle A, or anywhere else within

the entire tax code for that matter, in which Congress has authorized the

withholding of income tax from the citizen living and working within the

states of the Union. Alert the press!

An examination of the tax regulations reveals that the income tax is

imposed on foreign, and not on domestic items and sources of income.

Provisions within 26 CFR at section 1.861-8(f)(1) specifically list all

items of 'taxable income' from sources within the United States, and all

of the sources listed are foreign.

Although it will astonish most Americans to learn of this, the following

three are the only conditions under which a citizen living within the

union states could owe the income tax:

(1) When in receipt of income in the form of dividends coming from any

foreign source outside of the union states;

(2) When living and working abroad in a foreign country under a current

tax treaty with the U.S. and earning over the current exclusion, which

when combined with housing costs and other exemptions, exceeds $100,000;

(3) When withholding income tax as the U.S. agent or representative of a

foreigner doing business here within the united States (as per 1441, 1442,

and 1443 above).

If never engaged in any of the foregoing activities, no income tax -- not

so much as one thin dime -- has ever been paid. Since most citizens have

assessed themselves many thousands of dollars on Form 1040 over the course

of their working lives, the question then becomes, what exactly have they

been paying?

The answer is that they have been paying the Social Security employment

tax on wages under Subtitle C, as commonly reported by employers on Form

W-2, for the purpose of building credits towards welfare (wealth transfer)

entitlement programs such as Social Security.

However, because the citizen has executed an annual self-assessment under

penalty of perjury on the Form 1040 tax affidavit, swearing each year that

all earnings, compensation, receipts, etc., listed thereon as income to

him, the law is thereby rendered moot and the Constitution goes out the

window. The affidavit stands as true and correct, and the IRS relies upon

the sworn testimony.

Code section 6201(a) authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to assess

tax on stamps and on returns which have been filed. However, regardless of

whether or not the filer was actually in receipt of foreign sources or

items of income, or whether there was in fact ever a legal requirement for

him to file in the first place, once a return is filed, 6201(a) applies.

The IRS refers to this mass self-assessment phenomenon as 'voluntary

compliance'. This, in a nutshell, is the current revenue collection

system.

The income tax is reported through declaration and withholding, either by

the citizen with foreign sources of income or by the withholding agent of

the foreigner. The only requirement within the code for an individual to

file returns of income with respect to subtitle A can be found at code

section 6012 (a).

Under the 1980 Paperwork Reduction Act, Congress made the Office of

Management and Budget, abbreviated 'OMB', the watchdog required to review

any agency form or information collection request presented to a citizen,

and, if approved, to assign an OMB approval control number to the form.

Any form not bearing an OMB approval control number Congress calls

'bootleg', instructing that such a form may be ignored by the citizen.

Under 26 CFR part 602, OMB assigned approval control number 1545-0067 to

both tax regulations 1.1-1 'Tax imposed' and 1.6012-0 'Persons required to

make returns of income'. Note that these regulations implement underlying

code sections 1 and 6012, which as mentioned above, impose the income tax

and make an as yet unspecified individual required to file an income tax

return.

Contrary to popular expectation, the sole IRS form in existence on which

this number is displayed is not Form 1040, but Form 2555 'Foreign Earned

Income.'

The top of Form 2555 instructs the filer 'attach to Form 1040' and states

that 2555 is 'for use by U.S. citizens'. Further examination of the tax

regulations reveals that the 1040 form, titled 'U.S. Individual Income Tax

Return', is a supplemental worksheet to be attached to Form 2555 and to

numerous other primary, required returns. There is no requirement for the

1040 to be filed other than as a worksheet attached to a primary return.

It is interesting to note that the 1040 form is not titled 'U.S. Citizen

Income Tax Return', while Form 2555 'Foreign Earned Income' specifically

states that its use, as mentioned above, is for the citizen. Clearly, the

IRS understands the distinction between an individual and a citizen.

Treasury Decision 2313 issued in 1916 to 'collectors of internal revenue'

pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brushaber v. Union Pacific

Railroad Co. clarifies that the Form 1040 individual income tax return is

to be used by the U.S. agent of a foreigner in receipt of interest or

dividends from the stock of domestic corporations on behalf of the alien.

For the above reasons, the income tax under Subtitle A is not 'voluntary'

as some have asserted. It is mandatory, but only for those to whom it

applies. Since the law is limited in its application, the question of

whether it is mandatory or voluntary is superfluous. The question is: to

whom, and under what circumstances is the law applied?

With regard to the wage tax under Subtitle C, certain legal requirements

may be considered mandatory, but only for the payor of the wages, namely

the 'employer', and even then, only if both the participating employer and

the covered employee have agreed via voluntary application on Form W-4 to

participate in the entitlement programs.

26 CFR at section 31.3402(p)(1)-(b)(2) states with regard to the W-4 form:

'An agreement under section 3402(p) shall be effective for such period as

the employer and employee mutually agree upon. However, either the

employer or the employee may terminate the agreement prior to the end of

such period by furnishing a signed written notice to the other.'

Terminate means to end, stop, cut off, etc. This is not a form, just a

letter from one to the other in which written notice is served. It's that

clear. Please alert employers, employee leasing companies and 'temp'

agencies nationwide.

Under 26 CFR section 301.6109-1 'identifying numbers', a Taxpayer

Identification Number is required to be furnished by a nonresident alien

or a foreign corporation only. No regulation can be found requiring a

citizen within the union states to obtain, or to furnish, either a Social

Security Number (SSN) or an Employer Identification Number (EIN), both of

which are forms of Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TIN).

Under 42 USC section 405(c)(2)(B)(i), the Secretary of Social Security is

authorized to assign Social Security Numbers under subparagraph (I),

'... to aliens at the time of their lawful admission to the United States

either for permanent residence or under other authority of law permitting

them to engage in employment in the United States and to other aliens at

such time as their status is so changed as to make it lawful for them to

engage in such employment',

and under subparagraph (II),

'... to any individual who is an applicant for or recipient of benefits

under any program financed in whole or in part from Federal funds

including any child on whose behalf such benefits are claimed by another

person.'

The Social Security Administration confirms in writing to anyone who

inquires that: 'The Social Security Act does not require a person to have

a Social Security number in order to live and work in the United States,

nor does it require a Social Security number simply for the sake of having

one'.

However, believing that they are required to do so by law, Social Security

Numbers are routinely applied for by parents on behalf of their legally

incompetent minor children. Application is made on Form SS-5 'Application

For Social Security Account Number'. Legally, of course, there can never

be a requirement under force of written law to make application for

anything, making all applications 100% voluntary as already stated.

Since there is also no legal requirement to enter a Social Security Number

on Form W-4, to sign or submit the form, and no legal requirement for an

employer to obtain an Employer Identification Number in order to hire a

citizen, neither party -- 'employee' or 'employer' -- can be compelled to

participate in the welfare entitlement programs. Hence, compliance under

Subtitle C is correctly said to be voluntary.

IRS Publication 515 and Treasury regulation 1.1441-5 explain the proper

use of the Statement of Citizenship, the original of which is retained by

the withholding agent and a copy sent to the IRS in Philadelphia which is

the IRS' international tax office. This makes perfect sense since the

income tax is a tax on foreign source income. The Statement of Citizenship

authorizes and indemnifies the withholding agent not to withhold income

tax from the working citizen who chooses not to have the tax withheld.

The citizen working for a living within one of the union states who files

a 1040 form thereby creates a legal presumption of a tax liability where

none may actually exist under Law, and will be expected by the IRS to

continue to file unless and until the presumption of liability is rebutted

via a sworn Affidavit of Revocation and Rescission sent to the Secretary

of the Treasury pursuant to Title 5, section 552(d), thereby shifting the

burden of proof to the agency which must then disprove the statements of

fact contained within the affidavit and cannot do so.

Of course, the citizen who legally volunteers, as many thousands of

Americans have already done, to stop participating in Social Security,

Medicare, and other intergenerational wealth transfer programs will not

receive back any monies already paid in.

For a detailed and exhaustive understanding of the federal tax laws

pertaining to income and employment tax, it is highly recommended that the

reader view the two-hour introductory educational video titled 'The Truth

Behind The Income Tax' and the 12-hour master tax education video seminar

titled 'Just The Facts'. Write to me at

gordon@informamerica.com

for

ordering information.

Taxpayers new to this information might now want to ask themselves, 'Could

it be that my chains are imaginary?'.

Although only a minority of business owners across America understand the

power they hold in their hands, they can stop the New World Order gravy

train dead in its tracks, simply by refusing to use their non-required

Employer Identification Numbers, or to withhold payroll taxes for Uncle

Sam for free, thereby functioning as un unpaid custodian in a federal

building.

Look soon for an announcement here about the debut of a nationwide

organization and web site supporting America's nonwithholding business

owners. It's called 'F.R.E.E.' -- The Fellowship of Recently Enlightened

Employers.

POSTSCRIPT --

January, 2002

A fire cannot be extinguished by dousing it with oxygen, nor a doomed ship

saved by bailing water back INTO the boat. Yet the Constitution is clearly

burning, and our nation is clearly sinking.

Meanwhile, ideologically challenged Americans appalled over horrific

images of '9-11' displayed on their television sets (1) enthusiastically

wave their flags (2) while continuing (schizophrenically) to pay for their

own destruction (3) with the fruits of their very labor (4).

If this enabling trend continues, we will devolve into total fascism (5).

Therefore, in order to avert this preventable disaster -- and because it

now appears clear that the combined understanding of the federal power of

taxation of all 535 elected legislators (6) in Congress could fit into a

thimble (7), this review of the constitutional authority for federal

taxation was in order.

Please take a minute to forward this to elected and appointed officials

(8) at every level of government: county, state and federal. One never

knows when a seed planted will take root.

(1) made in Communist China

(2) also made in Communist China

(3) as dreamed of by Communists in China and elsewhere

(4) via wage taxes introduced by Communists succored by Franklin D.

Roosevelt (5) as in Communist China today (6) many of them known to be 'on

the take' from China (see a trend developing?) (7) when will they begin

wearing togas and playing the violin? (8) tax-consuming public servants

***

T H E · I N F O R M E D · A M E R I C A N

'Real News For Real Americans!'

· Protected by the 1st Amendment; Defended by the 2nd

· Life-empowering truths not covered by the 'watchdog' media

· Converting taxpayers back to citizens; a compass for freedom

· Read the current issue at

http://www.informamerica.com/news

· Subscribe to receive the latest articles -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/subscribe.htm

· Access the archives of past issues -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/archives.htm

WEEKLY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL

IRS bugging you? Got a tax or SSN question? Property at risk? Trying to

stop withholding? Join Gordon on Monday nights and get your most

perplexing questions answered. Held each Monday night at 9:30PM Eastern

(6:30PM on the extreme left coast). Click here for details -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/conference_call.htm

FREE REPORTS TO DOWNLOAD

To download the following FREE REPORTS and ZIP files (many files zipped

together to save space and decrease download time), if you are already on

our mailing list click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/download.htm

#1: 'HOW TO JOIN THE SAVE-A-PATRIOT FELLOWSHIP!' -- ZIP file with SAPF

Membership Application

#2: 'SAPF TOOLBOX' -- ZIP file loaded with Save-A-Patriot membership and

general tax info.

#3: 'THE TRUTH BEHIND THE INCOME TAX' -- Who really owes the income tax?

#4: 'THE TRUTH BEHIND PAYROLL TAX WITHHOLDING' -- No more W-4! 5: 'THE

#SENATOR CHARLES GRASSLEY REPORT' -- First Amendment at risk! 6: 'TAXING

#YOUR BELIEFS' -- Learn all about IRS computer fraud!

FREE BOOK OFFER

Read the underground best-seller, 'Losing Your Illusions', for 30 days for

FREE with no requirement to purchase. Click here for information on this

FREE OFFER - ->

http://www.informamerica.com/LYI_FREE_Book_Offer.htm

GET GORDON ON THE RADIO!

Here's a sure-fire, no-cost method to get the tax truth out to your

beleaguered neighbors. Tell your favorite freedom-minded talk radio host

about INFORM AMERICA! Sample audio cassette from one of Gordon's many past

radio interviews available.

MULTIPLY YOUR EFFORTS TO AWAKEN OTHERS

Why keep all this fun to yourself? Here's a quick and easy way to

introduce up to TEN of your friends and associates to the ideals of

individual liberty through exposure to our web site & articles. It’s

extremely effective, because it came from YOU! Click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/tellafriend.htm

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

For a thought-provoking list, click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/faq.htm

. Also, review our educational

materials (see below). If you still cannot locate the answers you seek,

write to <

gordon@informamerica.com

> and succinctly state your question(s).

You can also ...

SCHEDULE A CALL WITH GORDON

We appreciate your support of the Cause of American Liberty and would be

pleased to help further your education. To schedule a private telephone

conference with Gordon, click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/talk_to_gordon.htm

. A modest donation to

help with the phone bill would be much appreciated. Every FRN helps.

THE THREE RULES

The principled American who decides to exercise his rights in the face of

a government that ignores due process and shreds the Constitution needs to

pay careful heed to the following THREE RULES, and in this exact order: 1.

PROTECT PROPERTY 2. GET EDUCATED 3. TAKE ACTION? (see Rules 1 and 2 ;-)

Have you already mixed this up just a little? Better click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/three_rules.htm

POWERHOUSE EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS FROM INFORM AMERICA!

To acquire the tools and technology to wash your own brain, click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/educational_tools.htm

DISCLAIMER ABOUT TAX & LEGAL ADVICE

Nothing published by INFORM AMERICA! is to be construed as legal or tax

advice. If you find yourself in need of such advice, please seek the

services of a licensed attorney, C.P.A. or other tax or legal professional

who is fully versed in the Federalist Papers, the Anti-Federalist Papers,

Madison's Notes, Elliot's Debates, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,

the Internal Revenue Code and the tax regulations. This may be a

protracted search. Click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/legal_disclaimer.htm

HOME BASED BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FREEDOM MOVEMENT

Who says freedom doesn't pay? Discover quality firms offering

work-from-home opportunities either as an Independent Representative or on

a referral marketing basis. Many will compensate your efforts in CASH.

Supplement your present earnings, or go full-time for freedom! Click here

to learn more -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/freedom_opportunities.htm

FREEDOM RESOURCES FOR THE FREEDOM MINDED

· It's Your Stuff -- Protect It At

http://www.PrivateArena.com

· The Liberty Dollar - 'Real Money' at

http://www.NORFED.org

· The Truth Behind The Income Tax at

http://www.InformAmerica.com

· Prepare For The Coming Collapse at

http://www.FullyDiversified.com

· Bookmark Your Freedom Needs at

http://www.FreedomCenterUSA.com

· No More W-4! Take Home 100% at

http://www.AmericanContracting.com

· Financial Freedom Thru No-Risk Realty at

http://www.RealtyFreedom.com

INFORM AMERICA! CONTACT INFORMATION

gordon@informamerica.com

-- E-mail

· 801-715-3890 -- Phone and 24-hour fax

· 12 Carroll Street, Suite 1787, Westminster, MD 21157-4831 -- Mail &

Packages

OUR FAVORITE ALL-TIME QUOTE

'... it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,

tireless minority, keen to set brush fires in people's minds...' - Samuel

Adams, 'Father of the American Revolution' (many additional eye-opening

quotes available at our web site)

LIST MANAGEMENT

· SUBSCRIBE -- If you were forwarded this e-mail by a friend and would

like to 'opt in' to our e-mail distribution list and receive the latest

A.L.E.R.T.'s and issues of THE INFORMED AMERICAN!, click here -->

http://www.informamerica.com/news/subscribe.htm

"Socialism is not in the least what it pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of
civilization have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the social order based on private ownership in the means of production has created." -- Ludwig von Mises ("Socialism", 1922)

DISCLAIMER: The data on this website is the collaborative experience, contributions, and research of various websites, legal books, tax documents, researchers, associates, attorneys, CPA's, etc. and does not constitute legal advice. The primary purpose of this site is education. We do not advocate any specific course of action. What you do with this information and any course of action you decide to take, if any, is entirely your responsibility.

]