The Tax Freedom 101 Report
*Updates* - *News* - *Information*
- July 11th, 2000 - The Constitutional Revival Movement's News Source This weekly html e-newsletter contains:
UPDATES: * How to Have a Free Baby - The Non-Enumeration at Birth Procedure
NEWS: * The Death Tax Elimination Act * The "Death Tax" Shell Game - A Tax Freedom 101 Commentary "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way" - Franklin D. Roosevelt,
INFORMATION: * Dealing with Bad Credit Reports from IRS Legally Deficient Liens Dear Netizen: Are you enjoying The Tax Freedom 101 Report? You are. Great! Then why don't you recommend this newsletter to a friend or two. They don't have to be a crazed liberty-lovin "extremist" like you and me - even raging communists enjoy reading our newsletter. The forward button is just a click away...
Subscription information for The Tax Freedom 101 Report is contained at the end of this on-line report.
See?
This report and past issues have been posted at the TAXFREEDOM101 egroups on-line discussion forum. You can add or share additional information and comments with others, access documents referenced in the report and access other pertinent information at our forum. Click here to subscribe.
UPDATES: * How to Have a Free Baby - The Non-Enumeration at Birth Procedure
Many Americans who have awakened to the fraud surrounding Social Security are now voting with their feet to have their newborns unregistered with government. Many women are taking steps to avoid the intrusive nature of hospitals by having their children at home or somewhere where their privacy and rights will be respected.
However in today's society many parents still feel more comfortable with having their children in hospitals, and that is perfectly fine. Most parents wish to have the modern age medical facilities available in case a crisis does arise, and there is no shame in taking advantage of such if you can afford it. (This is an entirely separate story for another day). The dilemma that some parents find themselves in when wishing to take their child home without a government tracking number and the state issued certificate of joint ownership (Birth Certificate) is how to do such without raising suspicion and controversy with hospital staff.
Regardless of the fact that it is expensive to have a child in a hospital, it can also be cumbersome to leave without having filled out those two government issued forms that a hospital administrator may request you complete, that is the application for a SSN and the state birth certificate. Why must parents who do wish to have a non-enumerated child have to "ward-off" the hospital bureaucrat charged with obtaining the completed paperwork for the federal and state government? Ignorance. Well it really is not that hard to have a free baby, and there are some very easy and creative ways of stymieing the ward paper pushers, you just need to know how. If you or someone you know wants to have a free baby please share the following WorldNetDaily article and the RESOURCE we provide below.
The following article comes from a WorldNetDaily Commentary Exclusive
submitted by Claire Wolfe back in August 1999.
It is titled: "Keeping the baby un-numbered"
Little Citizen 577-00-666X came into the world today. Properly numbered, per international dictate, she joined billions of ...
To view the entire article, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_cwolfe/19990812_xccwo_keeping_ba.shtml
RESOURCE: Gordon Phillips of Inform America! recently recorded an audio cassette titled "How To Have A Free Baby", the purpose of which is to educate expectant parents and others as to the lawful methods he and his wife used to get their now 14-month-old son out of the hospital without SSN enumeration or a birth certificate. The requested donation for the tape, which comes with a sample "Affidavit Of Witness Of Live Birth" to be used in lieu of a birth certificate, is 10 FRN's (cash only please).
Mail your request to:
INFORM AMERICA!, 12 Carroll Street, Suite 1787, Westminster, MD 21157-4831.
Insert a note asking for the "How To Have A Free Baby" cassette. NEWS: * The Death Tax Elimination Act
From WorldNetDaily.com
THE POWER TO DESTROY
Senate facing estate-tax vote
Clinton opposes measure to eliminate economic 'death penalty'
by Jon E. Dougherty
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Senate is gearing up for a battle, possibly as early as next week, over a bill to incrementally reduce and then eliminate the so-called "death penalty tax," even as the White House attempts to mobilize its forces to oppose the measure.
The Death Tax Elimination Act, which passed the House June 9 and has been placed on the Senate calendar, would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period. - Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.
* The "Death Tax" Shell Game
A Tax Freedom 101 Commentary
"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way" - Franklin D. Roosevelt
The gift and estate tax is now widely referred to as the "Death Tax". A morbid oxymoron suitable to describe this hideous tax. Death to any tax is good in my book, but is Congress' seemingly benevolent actions to possibly repeal the "death tax" actually a well-planned scheme to remove something beneficial to citizens which has been hidden in plain view all along? We believe so since Congress has shown itself to rarely act in accordance and servitude toward our Constitutional Republic. Rather they're on a continual journey to further the agenda of the Marxist Socialist State for the benefit of their foreign buddies and the money masters.
Congress' recent posturing to eliminate the death tax could be due to one or a combination of factors.
The first factor we can think of is a phenomenon currently taking place on a wide-scale in America. That is the perfectly legal avoidance of the death tax via statutory and non-statutory property management and asset protection. We will call this first factor avenue "A" - that is people giving it away before they pass on, and we are not talking about the typical "I'm your friend call me" attorney approach using wills and trusts that end up in probate anyway. The wealthy who are "in-the-know" about sheltering and segregating assets avoid probate like the plague. They protect their property from hungry government and a litigious society by making use of legal vehicles not utilized by much of the general public.
The second factor is the actual written statutory law and what it says about the gift and estate tax. We will call this route avenue "B", a path less traveled, however one with greater merit by far as people awaken to their Constitutional heritage. Here is the real deal on avenue "B", and the not-so-obvious truth about the death tax, and the little secret about the law which Congress hopes you never learn. The death tax does not now nor has ever applied to citizens. That's correct. However don't try telling that to the ignorant masses, and the IRS. Even your local "tax pro" wouldn't know as many have never actually read the law, but they're paid well for their expertise in pseudo estate tax planning.
Here is why the death tax does not apply to citizens. This "death tax" takes the form of a direct tax, and is without apportionment as required by law. (See Article 1, section 2, Clause 3 and Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 of the US Constitution) The death tax rather applies only to the foreigner, who is outside the protection of our Constitution, and therefore is the "person" lawfully subject to the tax under subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code. This is yet another reason why the IR Code is perfectly fine and does not need to be abolished, but just enforced as written!
Here is how we provide for circumvention of the Constitution and lesser laws that apply to citizens.
The third plank of the Communist Manifesto, which is the abolition of all rights of inheritance was partially accomplished be enactment of various "estate tax" laws taxing the "privilege" of transferring property after death and gift before death. However citizens have rights, but they may apply to government for privileges if they so desire - privileges such as the application to participate in our "voluntary" Social Security system which is for all practical purposes the main avenue for collecting ALL inheritance taxes from citizens who participate in wealth redistribution. By participating in the "system" as so many like to call it, a citizen unwittingly exchanges their rights for privileges, or in other words sells their inheritance for a bowl of pottage.
Reality 101 is that asserting ones rights in court today to obtain an inheritance via avenue "B" (without the number as a citizen) is difficult and attempts to do so are routinely trampled upon by the IRS and the courts. This may be the reason why many resort to following avenue "A", to avoid the trouble associated with probate and the inheritance tax. Many find it too much of a hassle to duke-it-out with the IRS monster, and the federally pensioned judges over their Constitutionally "secured" protection under the Fifth Amendment which reads in part: "No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."
At this point you may ask, if the law does not require citizens to pay the "death tax", but they still do, why is Congress attempting to slowly over ten years phase out the estate and gift tax? It just does not make sense. It certainly is not to benefit Congress' largesse when citizens unwittingly pay the tax due to ignorance. Perhaps Congress is starting to feel guilty over the decades of wealth rape and wants to throw the serfs a bone. But that can't be, because Congress is merely a representation of what the people wish - that being more socialism.
If what FDR said was true - that nothing in politics happens by accident, and what we said about the law is true - that the gift and estate tax is to be paid only by foreigners according to the law, then who would benefit if the law were removed? It would solely benefit foreigners, since it never really did apply to citizens to begin with. Now ask yourself this question. Why now? Why is Congress moving to repeal a part of the code that has successfully, albeit non-applicably, sucked the very life blood from the veins of the American widower and allowed those in power a tremendous windfall of revenue that could only make Karl Marx beam with pride? Is it a preemptive strike? A conditioning if you will of the public to avoid controversy when it is discovered that they did not actually owe the tax? Is too much of the public catching on, asserting their rights, and/or properly protecting their property? If this is the case, it would mean that Congress would have no way of goading the IRS into retrieving the money "the old fashioned way" so in the the interim must at least appear to be champions of a majority of the people by removing this seemingly sinful branch of the Code. Removal of some of the language in subtitle B of the Code is certainly a possibility for a long term approach on stemming the hemorrhage of flight capital of citizens from the welfare state.
Perhaps the removal of the death tax is a friendly gesture by Congress to foreigners who wish to reside and shelter their assets here from their own country. Since foreigners are the actual people currently subject to the tax as it exists now, they would certainly benefit from its removal down the road. This could be one reason, and moreover a seriously realistic scenario consistent with history and the track record of Congress.
Don't call me a conspiratorialist yet.
If Congress' road with respect to repeal of the death tax was paved with good intentions for its citizenry, does that mean they have unwittingly shot themselves and the working class in the foot again? Will Congress leave the people with yet another more costly road to hoe if they are to support the welfare state alone? Consider what Goethe said, "There is nothing more terrifying than ignorance in action." Are a majority of our Congressmen just ignorant of the law, or just well groomed idiots dancing at the end of strings controlled by Internationalists? Rest assured that nothing in politics happens by accident. For example, do you think Bill Clinton's opposition to the measure to remove the death tax as reported is a truly righteous act with the citizen's well-being in mind? If so you would expect the President at some point to say I'm repealing the Death Tax bill because it only benefits foreigners, not our citizens. More likely the political opposition by our President is planned so as to push through what will appear to be a compromise later. A compromise on some other piece of legislation aimed at taking more from the pockets of citizens.
So have we reached the end? Have we discovered what the real reason is for the attempt to repeal the death tax? The answer certainly could be one, a combination, or all of the above factors as we have outlined. Just remember, if the repeal of the Death Tax does happen, it was planned that way!
This Tax Freedom 101 Commentary was provided by, Bryan Rusch - Independent Representative of the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship.
INFORMATION:
Dealing with Bad Credit Reports from IRS Legally Deficient Liens
The following article was mailed to all members of the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship via the members assistance program back in November of 1999. Non-members do not have access to much of the information and cutting edge education provided by the fellowship. In the coming months we plan to reproduce other articles from the case work department and paralegals of the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship and make them available through the Tax Freedom 101 Report.
THE LIBERTY TREE Vol. 2 Number 11 - November 1999
Dealing with Credit Reports
SAPF Casework and Paralegal Department
Although SAP has always believed in limiting one's participation in the Federal Reserve banking system, it is not usually possible for individuals and families to go "cold turkey." Of course if we lived in Utopia, all the earmarks of Liberty would be present in the lives of the Citizens of our great Constitutional Republic. But we do not live in Utopia. Far from it!
For instance, in these troubled days virtually all citizens must deal on a day-to-day basis with the evils of fiat currency. The fact that nearly everyone uses "money" that is created out of thin air by our esteemed banksters makes this fact quite clear.
One important consequence of this is that large numbers of people now need to borrow money, and are therefore dependent upon favorable ratings from credit bureaus. People are more dependent upon banks than days past.
For instance, years ago, a young couple on a tight budget and just starting out could usually buy a vacant lot either for cash or with a small loan and begin to build a house as best they could. It might take several years, but in time they would have a home of their own. Unfortunately, certain interests have passed laws prohibiting couples from doing this anymore. In most areas laws have been passed prohibiting families from taking more than two years to finish building their houses, or using a mobile home even as temporary quarters. (Of course, such laws invariably do not pass Constitutional muster, which is another story.) These conditions make it almost a certainty that families must obtain a long-term mortgage simply to provide themselves with a roof over their heads. This is just one example of how people today are more dependent upon banks and loans than days past, consequently, credit ratings are very serious matters to such dependent people.
The federal government has only two jurisdictions within the 50 states of the Union: Interstate Commerce and Postal Roads. Because credit bureaus that report credit are interstate businesses that engage in commerce they fall under the legitimate purview of the federal government, and therefore are subject to federal control. Accordingly, Congress has passed the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to protect consumers from fraudulent or otherwise unethical credit reporting practices. Key to this function is the requirement that when false information appears on a person's credit report there are remedies available to have it expunged.
When a consumer complains of false information on credit reports, Title 15 USC § 1681i ("Procedure in case of disputed accuracy") imposes the following requirements of the credit bureau: [that it] reinvestigate the completeness or accuracy of any item of information contained in a consumer's file when it is disputed by the consumer, and the consumer notifies the agency directly of such a dispute (T. 15 USC § 1681 I (1)(A); that the agency shall complete the investigation before the end of the 30 day period beginning on the date on which the agency receives the notice of the dispute from the consumer (T. 15 USC § 1681 I (1)(A);
that the consumer reporting agency shall provide written notice to a consumer of the results of a reinvestigation not later than 5 business days after the completion of the reinvestigation dispute (T. 15 USC § 1681 I (6)(A); and,
if, after any reinvestigation under paragraph (1) of any information disputed by a consumer, an item of information is found to be inaccurate or incomplete or cannot be verified, the consumer reporting agency shall promptly delete that item of information from the consumer's file or modify that item of information.
This means that the bureau must substantially verify the validity of any debt appearing on a credit report. This can only be accomplished by providing, (1) a copy of a contract that two parties entered into; or, (2) a certified judgment issuing from a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no other way to verify (provide substantial evidence of) a debt.
This is particularly significant when a lien appears on a credit report. A lien is not legally sufficient unless it is accompanied by a warrant of distraint issuing from a court of competent jurisdiction; and without that, a notice of lien is no evidence whatsoever, of a debt. In other words, a notice of lien or its equivalent is not verification of a debt, in the absence of a warrant of distraint.
Generally, if a person writes to the credit bureau requesting verification of a debt, and it is unable to provide verification within 30 days, the bureau will remove the information from the report.
However, in the case of a legally deficient lien, whether it is removed from the report or not depends on whether the agent handling the complaint is abiding by the written law. Frequently, be it the result of fraud or ignorance, the agent will intentionally fail to remove the unverified debt.
Sometimes, our members ask us to provide letters requesting verification of false information appearing on their credit reports - particularly where a legally deficient lien appears on it. Unfortunately in those instances where the government is alleged to be a creditor the results are mixed. The agent is frequently reluctant to go by the law when the government is involved.
Another aspect of federal credit laws has to do with collection agencies, which of course frequently work across state lines. The legislation in question is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The applicable statute is 15 USC § 1692c(c), which clearly states that "If a consumer notifies a debt collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay a debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further communication with the consumer, the debt collector shall not communicate further with the consumer with respect to such debt... " except for notification of further action. In other words, if one is being harassed by a collection agency, one can demand they cease and desist, invoking legal action if they refuse.
Additionally, 15 USC § 1692g(b) provides that "if the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing" within 30 days, disputing the alleged debt, the collection agency must cease collection activity "until the debt collector obtains verification of the debt or a copy of the judgment...
When a credit bureau cannot verify a debt within 30 days, and refuses to expunge it from a report as required by law, one can take them to court. If the case lands before an honest judge, the court will compel the agency to remove any unverified debts, such as a legally deficient lien. This is the duty of the judge.
The positive side of this is that when we Patriots are ultimately successful in bringing our government back within its Constitutional bounds the case can be re-opened and you can bet your bottom FRN the jury response would be very favorable.
Wishing you a tax-free day,
The TAX FREEDOM 101 Service Bureau
Do you have a web site that would benefit from Extreme traffic? Register on our FREE HitLynx page here.
Dear Netizen: Are you enjoying The Tax Freedom 101 Report? You are. Great! Then why don't you recommend this newsletter to a friend or two. They don't have to be a crazed liberty-lovin "extremist" like you and me - even raging communists enjoy reading our newsletter. The forward button is just a click away...
To be added to the Tax Freedom 101 Report, reply to the original newsletter or add@taxfreedom101.com with the words (ADD ME) in the subject line. To be removed from the Tax Freedom 101 Report, reply to the original newsletter or remove@taxfreedom101.com with the words (REMOVE ME) in the subject line.
"An election is nothing more than the advanced auction of stolen goods.." -- Ambrose Bierce
DISCLAIMER: The data on this website is the collaborative experience, contributions, and research of various websites, legal books, tax documents, researchers, associates, attorneys, CPA's, etc. and does not constitute legal advice. The primary purpose of this site is education. We do not advocate any specific course of action. What you do with this information and any course of action you decide to take, if any, is entirely your responsibility.
